In 19, plaintiff Allan Bakke, a Caucasian, applied for admission to the University, which is supported by public funds. We conclude that the program, as administered by the University, violates the constitutional rights of nonminority applicants because it affords preference on the basis of race to persons who, by the University's own standards, are not as qualified for the study of medicine as nonminority applicants denied admission. In this case we confront a sensitive and complex issue: whether a special admission program which benefits disadvantaged minority students who apply for admission to the medical school of the University of California at Davis (hereinafter University) offends the constitutional rights of better qualified applicants denied admission because they are not identified with a minority. Colley as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Meyers, John Denvir, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Williams, Myers & Quiggle, Emma Coleman Jones, Robert L. Lundberg and Gary Morrison for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Snyder and John Ligtenberg as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.ĭonald L.
Links for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.ĭavid Lehrer, Justin Finger, Joy Meyers, Edward Leavy, Arnold Forster and Robert J. Jacobs, Blanckenburg, May & Colvin, Reynold H. Separate dissenting opinion by Tobriner, J.) J., McComb, Sullivan, Clark and Richardson, JJ., concurring. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Regents of University of California, 18 Cal.3d 34ĪLLAN BAKKE, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v.
0 kommentar(er)
